Fatcow Icon
Study links poor health to mountaintop mining
by Ralph B. Davis
rdavis@civitasmedia.com
Mar 15, 2013 | 2503 views | 2 2 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print

A study that compared the health of Floyd Countians to residents of Rowan and Elliott counties concludes that there is a link between mountaintop removal coal mining and overall poorer health of those living in close proximity to such mining operations.

The study, “Personal and Family Health in Rural Areas of Kentucky With and Without Mountaintop Coal Mining,” authored by Dr. Michael Hendryx, of the Department of Health Policy, Management and Leadership at West Virginia University, says that communities that have mountaintop mining show worse results in “self-rated health status, illness symptoms across multiple organ systems, lifetime and current asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypertension,” as well as household members reporting “reporting serious illness or had died from cancer in the past five years.”

Furthermore, the study says mining areas fare worse in health statistics even when adjusted for other factors, such as different rates of education, obesity, smoking, age, sex, marital status and work experience in coal mining.

“The results of this study add to previous evidence that Appalachian health disparities are concentrated in mountaintop coal mining areas of the region,” Hendryx writes in the report.

The study points to air and water pollution as a potential reason for the differences.

“The early environmental evidence shows higher levels of respirable dust in the [mountaintop mining] versus nonmining control sites, and higher estimates of deposition or dose of particulate matter into the lung …” the report says. “Water samples from [mountaintop mining] communities include substantially elevated conductivity and pH, elevated ammonium and phosphate concentrations, and elevated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phenols.”

However, the report further states that isolating the results to one cause is likely impossible.

“The symptoms reported more commonly in the [mountaintop mining] community included chest pain, persistent cough, wheezing, skin rashes, stomach and abdominal pain, gall bladder problems, pain in muscles and joins, headaches, fatigue and others,” the report says. “On the one hand, if there are environmental exposures taking place in these areas, it may seem surprising that health effects could be so widespread as opposed to more focused symptoms resulting from exposure to a particular agent. However, early environmental evidence indicates that there is not a single agent or transport route that characterizes these mining environments, but rather multiple exposure types may be occurring that could impact different people in different ways.”

The study was released in the Journal of Rural Health this week. It is similar in both its methodology and findings to a study Hendryx authored last year that examined health in mining and non-mining areas of West Virginia.

Hendryx came under fire when his earlier study was released last year, with critics saying he is biased against the coal industry.

Kentucky Coal Association President Bill Bissett did not back away from the criticism when asked for comment Friday.

“While Dr. Hendryx is not a medical doctor, he is a researcher who begins his research with a bias against coal and its extraction,” Bissett said. “This bias is further revealed through his coordination with and the support of anti-coal groups such as the KFTC.”

Bissett said Friday he has not yet had chance to review Hendryx’s most recent study, but said he is skeptical of the findings.

“While I have not read this new publication, I have read his past work,” Bissett said. “In the past, Hendryx has used information gained through telephone interviews instead of medical records or actual examinations. While the challenges facing Appalachians and their health are well documented, Hendryx’s work seems more connected to political expediency than substance.”

Hendryx’s latest study will likely not win him new friends in the coal industry, as it makes a direct appeal for the end of mountaintop mining.

“The precautionary principle of environmental science dictates that prudent steps be undertaken to minimize and eliminate risks from possible exposure,” the study concludes. “As has been previously recommended based on the environmental and public health evidence, one of these steps is that [mountaintop mining] practices should end. Absent that, regulations governing both air and water quality in impacted communities may be strengthened.”



Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
hebintn
|
March 16, 2013
I'd like to know what fact there is behind Mr. Bissett's criticism of Dr. Hendryx in saying, he

"begins his research with a bias against coal and its extraction". Like any good scientist Dr. Hendryx starts with an observation... people are sick. Then asks a question... what is making them sick. He collects data using accepted methods and publishes his data in a peer reviewed scientific journal. Nowhere does he say that MTR specifically causes these illnesses. He shows that people that live in close proximity to MTR have a greater chance of getting ill. He shows that people in adjacent areas without MTR don't have the same chance of getting sick. This is not bias it is science.

People that find scientific reports an inconvenience for them, deny the facts that science seeks the truth in our world. This is what "peer review" is all about. It validates the science. These people are free to attempt to prove the science wrong by presenting their own peer reviewed data and conclusions. In the end the scientific community will arrive at the truth. This is when politicians and corporations must listen and act to do what is best for the people, rather than simply deny the science as false.

BoWebb
|
March 16, 2013
Bisset here manages to tell two lies in one sentence. Bisset: “While I have not read this new publication, I have read his past work. In the past, Hendryx has used information gained through telephone interviews instead of medical records or actual examinations." That is not tue. Bisset obviously has not read Hendryx's past work. If he did he would have found that there were no phone interviews involved. The WV cancer research was conducted through door to door interviews with people that consented to be interviewed. The health question asked were non biased originating from the National Center for Disease Control. Only live, face to face interviews were used. If a wife said her husband had cancer but he was not at home at the time, he was not counted in the study; only face to face. No home was revisited. So, if anything the research in the Coal River Valley of WV was extremely coal friendly and still the results showed cancer rates double that of the second study site which had no mountaintop removal. Maybe Bisset will now say that the CDC is biased against the coal industry. No doubt Bisset would say Jesus Christ was biased against the coal industry if Jesus was a researcher. Bottom line: The coal industry is placing innocent citizens health beneath that of Wall Street profit. Those that defend Mountaintop Removal are aiding and abetting the coal industry in an act that is effecting the health of hundreds of thousands of real People, even their own family and their own children. And, that is the saddest part, because it is at times when change is most needed that people who profit from the status quo become the most likely to defend the status quo and agents of a sociopolitical system.

Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: